SHAKESPEAREAN FOOLS AND CLOWNS
SHAKESPEAREAN
FOOLS AND CLOWNS
Appearing in most of Shakespeare's
dramas, the clown or fool figure remains one of the most intriguing
stage characters in the Shakespearean oeuvre and has frequently captured the
interest of contemporary critics and modern audiences. Taking many forms, Shakespearean
fools may be generally divided into two categories:
1. The clown, a general term that
was originally intended to designate a rustic or otherwise uneducated
individual whose dramatic purpose was to evoke laughter with his ignorance; and
the courtly fool or jester, in whom wit and pointed satire accompany low comedy.
2.The dramatic sources of
Shakespeare's simple-minded clowns are at least as old as classical antiquity.
In the plays themselves, such figures as
Bottom of A Midsummer Night's Dream and Dogberry of Much Ado About Nothing are
typically classified as clowns, their principal function being to arouse the
mirth of audiences. The history of the courtly fool or jester in England is
somewhat briefer, with these fools making early appearances in the courts of
medieval aristocracy during the twelfth century. By the time of Queen
Elizabeth's reign,
courtly
fools were a common feature of English society, and were seen as one of two
types: natural or artificial. The former could include misshapen or
mentally-deficient individuals, or those afflicted with dwarfism. Such fools
were often considered pets—though generally dearly loved by their masters—and
appear in frequently in Shakespeare's writing. The artificial fool, in contrast,
was possessed of a verbal wit and talent for intellectual repartee. Into this
category critics place Shakespeare's intellectual or "wise-fools,"
notably Touchstone of As You Like It, Feste of Twelfth Night, and King Lear's
unnamed Fool .Critical analysis of Shakespearean clowns and fools has largely
explored the thematic function of the peculiar individuals.
Many commentators have observed the satirical potential of the fool. Other topics of critical inquiry concerning fools are varied. Several scholars have studied the significance of certain Elizabethan actors who were thought to have initially enacted the roles Shakespeare wrote. Prominent among these is the comedic actor Robert Armin, for whom several critics have suggested Shakespeare created the witty, even philosophical, fool roles of Feste, Touchstone, and Lear's Fool. Still other critics have focused on Shakespeare's less easily categorized clowns.
Comments